Blog

Learning Center

We keep you up-to-date with all the latest tax news and changes in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's Marijuana Tax Clash

In the arena of cannabis legislation, Michigan positions itself as a significant player with its newly proposed 24% wholesale marijuana tax. Currently embroiled in a legal dispute, this tax could reshape economic dynamics across the cannabis industry. As initial legal hearings commence, the nation watches closely, anticipating the ramifications for cannabis pricing and the fortitude of voter-driven tax policies.

Regardless of your geographical location or cannabis consumption habits, this unfolding case is critical. Its outcomes may guide other states on how to architect, adapt, and fortify their cannabis taxation structures and possibly hint at ensuing legal confrontations as the sector evolves.

Image 2

What's Michigan's New Proposal?

Embedded within Michigan's fiscal blueprint for 2025–2026 is a 24% wholesale cannabis tax, serving as a funding conduit for roadwork. It signifies an operational shift, impacting products at an earlier supply chain phase, ahead of retail showcases.

Adding complexity to Michigan’s cannabis tax landscape are two pre-existent levies:

  • A 10% excise tax on cannabis retailers, democracy’s fruit from 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax, positioning the state among ones with intricate cannabis tax frameworks if the wholesale measure triumphs.

Grounds for Legal Contestation

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) challenges the tax’s constitutional validity. Their grievance hinges on an essential interpretation:

The 2018 cannabis law's protections from alteration missing the supermajority threshold.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), ratified by voters, guards this legal framework, mandating a three-fourths legislative supermajority for amendments. The recent tax enactment bypassed this hurdle with a straightforward majority.

MCIA’s spokesperson, Rose Tantraphol, underscored their dedication in Michigan Advance: “As the chief cannabis trade assembly, we’re championing the electorate’s will.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry advocates caution that fiscal burdens could redirect consumers to illicit peddlers, echoing scenarios in states like California.

Image 3

The State’s Counterargument

Michigan’s official rebuttal argues:

  • The wholesale levy is distinct, not a reinterpretation of MRTMA

  • The legislature’s mandate includes devising new taxes for fiscal assignments

  • Its primary aim is generating funds for road infrastructure, disentangled from altering cannabis decrees

Should judicial verdicts align with the state's justification, the enactment date for the tax is pegged for January 1, 2026.

Implications for Cannabis Consumers

This matter bears relevance beyond Michigan’s borders, due to the potential ripple effect on cannabis tax systems nationwide. Survival of this tax could mean:

  • Wholesale costs escalate

  • Retail prices adjust sharply

  • Consumers gravitate towards more affordable black market sources

  • Consolidation pressures on smaller cannabis business entities

A judicial rebuff would sustain Michigan's prevailing tax stance, noted for its affordability within the national context.

Image 1

Broader National Repercussions

Despite its Michigan-centric origins, this lawsuit casts shadows over national cannabis legalities.

1. Voter Enacted Protections' Stress Test

Allowing tax enactments without supermajority approval could redefine ballot initiative processes nationwide.

2. Influence on Alternative Cannabis Tax Strategies

States struggling with infrastructure financing could emulate Michigan if the case concludes favorably.

3. National Spotlight on Cannabis Tax Disparities

While Oregon-like states offer modest cannabis taxes, tax-heavy states like California continue to face thriving illicit commerce.

Michigan might set a legal precedent for similar tax deliberations across state lines.

The Path Forward

The Michigan Court of Claims has begun adjudicating, awaiting deeper exploration by the state’s Supreme Judiciary. Irrespective of eventual solutions, the results will be influential—not merely for Michigan’s cannabis sector, but for state-to-state legal strategies concerning voter legislation, emerging market regulations, and taxation dynamics.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.

Butler Location

12714 W. Hampton Ave, Unit F
Butler, Wisconsin 53007
(414) 509-1626

Milwaukee Location

Remote
Milwaukee, WI 53217